Colonel John Kelly
The following sketch of him is taken from an address made by James
Merrill, Esquire, on the 8th of April, 1835, when the monument,
purchased by his relatives, was put in position with public ceremony.
Colonel John Kelly was born in Lancaster county, in this State, in
February, 1744. After the purchase from the Indians of 1768, and
before the opening of the land office in 1769, he came to Buffalo
Valley, then a part of Berks county. Here he suffered all the
hardships and privations, which are inseparable upon the first settle-
ment of a new country. He was tall, about six feet two inches in
height, vigorous and muscular, with his body so inured to labor as to
be almost insensible to fatigue, and a mind so accustomed to dangers,
that dangers ceased to alarm. In the prime of manhood, and in the
vigor of health, with intelligence to understand correct principles,
and with firmness to adhere to them, it may well be supposed that he
took a commanding position among his fellows. He was a captain, and a
major at twenty-seven years of age, and when his country called on
her sons to save her from the fangs of a tyrant, he was ready. At the
very darkest period of the revolutionary war, when all was lost, but
honor and hope, and when hope was almost buried in despair, in the
fall of 1776, he volunteered to assist in the protection of New
Jersey. He was present at Trenton, when the Hessians surrendered, and
assisted in that most masterly movement on Princeton, by which the
chain of communications of the enemy was broken, all their plans
deranged, and their army compelled to return to New York and its
neighborhood, and to leave New Jersey free to avenge her wrongs.
When we consider the depression of public spirit, how public
confidence in the final success of our cause was shaken by the battle
of Long Island, and the losses of Fort Washington and Lee, with most
of our military stores; when we consider that at onetime the American
army numbered less than two thousand men, we would
not think it wonderful if all should have been given up for lost - and
so it would, if the stake had been less. But our people believed that
they had no right to abandon their cause of liberty. They were bound
to protect it for themselves, and upon their success depended the
freedom of their posterity. They must decide, whether or not, their
children should be slaves. They must decide whether all people must
bow their necks to the iron yoke of despotism, or whether they might
anticipate a time when free institutions should prevail through the
world. Our friend and his confederates of that day might have retired
into an ignoble and contemptible security. They might have said, what
is New Jersey to us? We have homes and firesides, which may be
endangered. But they argued better: if we refuse to come to the
rescue, we cannot expect security. We cannot propitiate the monster
tyranny, by shrinking from our duty. Influenced by these
considerations, our friends went to the rescue of our sister State.
Our friend joined the army fully resolved to do his duty. Then was
the time to test his vigor of body, as well as the firmness of his
mind. For three days at one time, there was no regular service of
provisions, and for more than thirty-six hours, at another time, they
were constantly on the march, or in action, without a moment's sleep or
giving up their arms. In the course of one of their retreats, the
commander-in-chief, through Colonel Potter, sent an order to Major
Kelly to have a certain bridge cut down to prevent the advance of the
British, who were then in sight. The major sent for an axe; but
represented that the enterprise would be very hazardous. Still the
British advance must be stopped, and the order was not withdrawn. He
said he could not order another to do what some might say he was
afraid to do himself; he would cut down the bridge.
Before all the logs on which the bridge lay were cut off, he was
completely within the range of the British fire, and several balls
struck the log on which he stood. The last log broke down sooner than
he expected, and he fell with it into the swollen stream. Our
soldiers moved on, not believing it possible for him to escape. He,
however, by great exertions, reached the shore through the high water
and the floating timber, and followed the troops. Incumbered, as he
must have been, with his wet and frozen clothes, he, on his road, made
a prisoner of a British scout, an armed soldier, and took him
into camp. What did Curtius do more than this? If such an instance
of devoted heroism had happened in Greece or Rome, the day would have
been distinguished from all other days. A medal would have been
struck, and every means used to secure the everlasting remembrance of
such a deed. In England such a man would have been made a knight or a
lord, with the thanks of Parliament. In our poor devoted land such
instances were too common to receive especial notice. History
mentions that our army was preserved by the destruction of that
bridge; but the manner in which it was done, or the name of the person
who did it, is not mentioned. It was but one of a series of heroic
acts, which happened every day, and our soldiers then were more
familiar with the sword than with the pen. As we have met to erect a
marble tomb over the remains of that individual, it is right for us to
bring out this act into more bold relief.
Let it be borne in mind, that at this time no arrangement had been
made respecting prisoners; that the British commanders only admitted
that they arrested rebels, and not that they took prisoners of war.
Thus all who fought on our side, in addition to the common dangers of
war, might expect, if taken, to suffer an ignominious death. After his
discharge, Major Kelly returned to his farm and his family, and during
the three succeeding years the Indians were troublesome neighbors to
this then frontier settlement. He became colonel of the regiment, and
it was his duty to keep watch and ward against the incursions of
hostile Indians, through our mountain passes. At one time our people
were too weak to resist, and our whole beautiful country was
abandoned. Colonel Kelly was among the first to return - for at least
two harvests reapers took their rifles to the fields, and some of the
company watched while others wrought. Colonel Kelly hid the principal
command of the scouting parties in this Valley, and very often he was
out in person. Many and many nights has he lain among the limbs of a
fallen tree to keep himself out of the mud, without a fire, because a
fire would indicate his position to the enemy. He had become well
skilled in their mode of warfare. One circumstance deserves
particular notice. The Indians seem to have resolved on his death,
without choosing to attack him openly. One night he had reason to
apprehend that they were near. He rose in the morning, and, by
looking through the crevices of his log-house,
he ascertained that two, at least, if not more, were laying with their
arms, so as to shoot him when he should open his door. He fixed his
own rifle, and took his position, so that by a string he could open
the door, and watch the Indians. The moment he pulled the door open,
two ball came into the house, and the Indians rose to advance. He
fired and wounded one, and both retreated. After waiting to satisfy
himself that no others remained, he followed them by the blood; but
they escaped.
For many years Colonel Kelly held the office of a magistrate of the
county. In the administration of justice, he exhibited the same
anxiety to do right, and the same disregard of self gain, which had
characterized him in the military service of the country. He would at
any time forgive his own fees, and if the parties were poor, pay the
constable's costs, to procure a compromise. While, by industry and
economy, his own pecuniary circumstances were comfortable and easy, he
seemed to desire the prosperity of all men, and most anxiously to
desire, that all neighbors should be friends. No man ever in vain
sought his interposition to reconcile conflicting interests, to soothe
angry passions, to stand, as the defender and protector of the poor
man, the widow, and the orphan.
He obeyed the injunction, "be given to hospitality." There are few
middle aged men in this country, who have not experienced the cordial
welcome, which every friend received at his house. It is true, that
so general is the hospitality of his neighborhood that the want of it
would be considered a great vice; but in him it was a part of the same
character, indicating a freedom from selfishness, an inability to
enjoy fully God's bounties alone; a feeling that a good thing is
rendered far more valuable by participation; and a conviction that the
diffusion of happiness is not merely right in itself, but the source
of great joy to every well-regulated mind.
Colonel Kelly was an affectionate husband, and a kind and judicious
father, as well as a friendly and hospitable neighbor.
Thus have we seen our venerable friend performed his domestic,
social, military, and political duties in such a manner as to entitle
himself to the love and esteem of his neighbors, and to the thanks and
honors of his countrymen and of posterity. It may be asked, could a man
so punctiliously perform all those duties, and leave out of his regard
his obligations to his Maker? No, indeed, my friends,
he did not lack that crowning virtue. He was a sincere and an
exemplary Christian, and he adorned all his other virtues by exhibiting
a pattern of humility well worthy of imitation. Having no anxieties
who should be greatest in the kingdom of Heaven, he had no striving
who should be greatest in the Church on earth, his profession of
religion was well sustained by his practice.
Towards the end of a long and active life, Colonel Kelly became,
by disease, incapable of much motion, and seldom left his home. He
seemed to be retiring from public view, and preparing to leave this
world when he should be called. He had that true characteristic of
bravery, an indisposition to fight his battles over again, and that
feeling of humility, that where a man has only done his duty, boasting
has no place. It is in some measure owing to this reserve that our
notice of his life must be so brief and so imperfect. He seemed not
to know, that other men would have done differently from him; but to
believe that whatever distinguished him from others, arose mainly from
the circumstances under which he acted. We are of another
generation, and his contemporaries have either gone down to the grave,
or through lapse of time and failing faculities, are unable to give
particular details. From himself, but a few gleanings from a life
long and full of incidents, have been obtained.
His last end proved his character to be consistent. He met the
grim messenger calmly; "for he knew in whom he had trusted;" and he could
"walk through the valley and shadow of death, fearing no evil." Age
brought its weakness, no doubt. The frame was bent, and the muscles
relaxed; but the mind - the immortal mind -could not be obscured. It
brightened more and more "unto the perfect day." He has passed beyond
"that bourne, whence no traveler returns." He has gone, we humbly
trust, to that Heaven where "there remaineth a rest for the righteous,
and where the wicked cease from troubling." Emphatically may it be
said, that after a life well spent, and in firm hope of a resurrection
to immortal glory, at the age of eighty-eight years, he departed,
leaving his memory to our care and his virtues for our imitation - James
Merrill, Esquire's, Address.
Colonel Kelly's children were: James, who moved to Penn's valley,
and died there. He was the father of Honorable James K. Kelly, United
States Senator, of Portland, Oregon; John, who also
moved to Penn's valley; William, who married a daughter of Archibald
Allison, of Centre county, and died, January 27, 1830; Andrew, a
bachelor, who was born 1783, and died on the old place, September 24,
1867, aged eighty-four; Samuel Kelly, of Armstrong county,
Pennsylvania; Elizabeth, married to Simeon Howe; Maria, married to
John Campbell, of Lewisburg; Robert, who died April 12, 1865, aged
seventy-seven; Joseph, died March 2, 1860, aged sixty-six; David H.
Kelly, Esquire, deceased, late county commissioner of Union county.
I note, also, the death of Reverend Thomas Smiley, aged seventy-three,
born (in Dauphin county now) in 1759, of Scotch-Irish parentage.
Served in Colonel Curtis Grubb's battalion of militia. Ordained in
December, 1802. Settled in White Deer in 1808, where he established
the first regular Baptist church within the bounds of Union county.
Hi, Heather, I greatly enjoy reading your articles as I am a huge history buff. I am a direct descendant of Colonel John Kelly and have researched him and his family for the past 32 years. I was trained in research during my graduate work at Villanova University and am relentless in thoroughly searching facts, always using a minimum of two sources for verification of each fact. This to say that in the past 32 years of my painstaking research of Colonel John Kelly I have never once found a single document that states his middle name as Patrick. I have, however, found several instances of people posting his name online as "John Patrick Kelly." When I questioned one of these people as to their source, they stated that they copied it from someone else's online information which did not include a source. As a member of the DAR through Colonel John Kelly, I have thoroughly researched all of their documents pertaining to him; no middle name is ever listed. In fact, none of his siblings ever used a middle name, there are no other family members with the first or middle name Patrick, including his parents, siblings, children, nephews, grandchildren and multiple descendants. There was a Patrick Kelly who lived in Dauphin County (formerly Lancaster) in the 1700s who had a son John whom people in the past wrongly identified as Colonel John Kelly, but Patrick's family has never been proven to be related to Colonel John Kelly's family. Therefore, I believe it is an error to use the name Patrick in the colonel's name.
ReplyDeleteI would tend to agree that his middle name was not Patrick based on the anecdotal evidence of the below family tree, written on the back of one of my great grandfathers wedding invitation circa 1909; notice that most names include the middle names yet not for Col Kelly (of whom I am descended from thru his son James).
Deletehttps://imgur.com/a/cTgQAzJ
Cynthia, Is everything else that you've read her correct as far as your research goes? I would love to speak to you regarding your research. Our family history is trying to sort out the children of Col John KELLY. If you are inclined, can you contact me at 402-679-6371 or mattjenkelly@cox.net? I would greatly appreciate it. -Matthew Kelly
ReplyDeleteI am a direct descendant of his son Samuel. Thanks for sharing !
ReplyDeleteWow, this is amazing. Just started with my research on the Kelly family. I am from Bellevue Michigan, I have many family members in our Cemetery. (Riverside Cemetery) Not sure if I have all the correct data. However, I have followed Col. John Kelly back to one of his son's (Andrew). Andrew had a son named Joel Kelly, my Great Great Grand Father. Joel had a son named Joseph Andrew, my Great Grand Father. Joseph Andrew had a son name Gail H. Kelly, my grand father. My father was Vant H. Kelly. I am not sure what avenue to research to find out if this is all correct? Would you have any recommendations as to where i would start?
ReplyDeleteCol. John Kelly was my sixth gen great grandfather through his son Joseph. I also agree that in all of the research I have done on the Kelly family I have never seen a middle name for Col. John. The most informative and accurate source of information that I have found is "The Genealogical account of the ancestors in America of Joseph Andrew Kelly Campbell and Eliza Edith Deal (his wife). Page 7, 51-74. Joseph Andrew Kelly was the son of Mary Helen Kelly and John Campbell and one of Col. John's grandson's. The article written by Heather I felt was very accurate except for one item. John Kelly Sr. arrived in the U.S. (was a British Colony at the time) in 1723. His father was William Kelly and mother was Mary ?? John Kelly Sr. married a woman by the name of Mary in 1715 maiden name ?? I have seen records for a Margaret Armour and Mary Ezemy both married a John Kelly but neither was Col. John Kelly. Spencer may be a good possibility. John Kelly Sr. and Mary had four children Andrew 1738, William 1740, Elizabeth, 1742 and Col John Kelly 1744. Mary Spencer is a good possibility. Senator James Kerr Kelly was the son of John Kelly born 1774 and was married to Anna Caldwell. They made their home in Centre County, PA and had only the one son Senator James Kerr Kelly.
ReplyDeleteJames Kelly born 1776 married his first cousin Elizabeth, daughter of Elizabeth Kelly (1742) and Robert Hanna.
Col John Kelly and his wife Sarah Poak had 10 children all of whom are listed in his will. John, James, Elizabeth, William, Andrew, Samuel, Robert, Mary Helen, Joseph and David.
In doing my family history I have encountered this fellow frequently. However, my connection to him would be through his wife, Sarah Poak or Pollock. One fact disturbs me. On the 1800 census for Chanceford, York, PA there is a handwritten listing for Col. John Kelly. Were there two?
Delete